Re: PG 19 release notes and authors

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>

From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-06T14:04:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/6/26 09:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Apr  5, 2026 at 04:09:57PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2026-Apr-05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > I am not sure PG 19 follows this, but we might want to follow it going
>> > forward.
>> 
>> More and more I am getting the feeling that the commit guidance is
>> actually misguided.  The document itself is not very good (I mean, why
>> use XML-lookalike to represent a commit message, which is regular
>> English prose??); and I don't feel it represents actual consensus.
> 
> I agree I am not a fan of the XML, but Joe Conway introduced it and I
> didn't object.

I am by no means married to it -- feel free to improve it however 
everyone prefers.

>> > A larger issue is that since we now have links to the commits in the
>> > release notes, there might no longer be a need to list _any_ names next
>> > to the release note items.
>> 
>> I don't understand your motivation for saying things like these.
> 
> Uh, I am asking if something is still useful due to recent changes and
> can be removed as useless.

I don't think it is useless and I do think it would be a loss in several 
ways to the community. But I also recognize that it takes a great deal 
of effort to do, so I understand why it is worth asking the question.

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add tests for lock statistics, take two

  2. Introduce a new mechanism for registering shared memory areas