Re: [PATCH v4] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>,
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-10-21T17:36:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net> writes: > On Tuesday 2025-10-21 00:15, Tom Lane wrote: >> Not sure where we go from here, but clearly a bunch of research >> is going to be needed to decide whether this is committable. > pg_dump files from before your latest fix still exist, and they possibly > contain block header every 30 bytes (or however wide is the table rows). > A patch in pg_restore would vastly improve this use case. Yes, that's a fair case to worry about. > May I suggest the attached patch, which replaces fseeko() with fread() > if the distance is 32KB or less? Sounds rather improbable that this > would make things worse, but maybe it's possible to generate a dump file > with 32KB wide rows, and try restoring on various hardware? > If this too is controversial, then we can reduce the number to 4KB. This > is the buffering that glibc does internally. By using the same in the > given patch, we avoid all the lseek(same-offset) repetitions between the > 4K reads. This should be a strict gain, with no downsides. I spent some time strace'ing pg_restore on older dump files with relatively small block sizes. You are right that glibc seems quite stupid about this: it appears to issue a kernel lseek() call for every fseeko(), even though it keeps using the same 4K worth of data it had previously read in. I thought maybe that was an artifact of the relatively old glibc in RHEL8, but glibc 2.40 from Fedora 41 is no better. I also checked current macOS, and it's marginally smarter: it issues just one seek call per read call. But that seek is still useless, since the read is still 4K adjacent to the previous 4K. (I wonder if maybe there is some POSIX standards compliance issue involved here? We don't care about the possibility that the disk file is changing under us, but other applications do, and maybe the kernel-visible seek calls are required for some reason.) Putting in a minimum-block-size-to-seek check gets rid of the seek calls entirely, producing a straight stream of reads, on all three platforms. I agree that doing this with a threshold of 4K seems like a no-brainer, since that seems to be the common default stdio buffer size. Using a larger threshold, or setting up a larger buffer, seems to risk platform-dependent results, so it would require more performance testing than I care to do now. Let's do 4K and call it a day. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Avoid short seeks in pg_restore.
- fba60a1b107d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Don't rely on zlib's gzgetc() macro.
- 277dec651472 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Add more TAP test coverage for pg_dump.
- 20ec9958921a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split 002_pg_dump.pl into two test files.
- 9dcf7f1172cd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Align the data block sizes of pg_dump's various compression modes.
- 66ec01dc4124 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix serious performance problems in LZ4Stream_read_internal.
- 1f8062dd9668 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix poor buffering logic in pg_dump's lz4 and zstd compression code.
- fe8192a95e6c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix issue with reading zero bytes in Gzip_read.
- bf18e9bd70de 17.7 landed
- a239c4a0c226 19 (unreleased) landed
- 6a4009747c36 18.1 landed
- 1518b7d76aad 16.11 landed
-
Restore test coverage of LZ4Stream_gets().
- eac2b1697d48 17.7 landed
- 661b320ed4e0 18.1 landed
- 26d1cd375f15 19 (unreleased) landed