Horton

Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-29T18:49:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
>     I  don't  really  get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
>     clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as  the
>     winner.    Maybe   I   missed   something,  but  what's  this
>     disscussion about?

We agreed on transactional behavior ... but Scott is proposing a variant
that was not considered earlier, and it seems worth considering.

			regards, tom lane