Re: Optimizing FastPathTransferRelationLocks()
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-03-14T13:55:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2025/03/13 0:32, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Fair enough. The code is more readable this way. That itself is an improvement. > > I stared at c4d5cb71d229095a39fda1121a75ee40e6069a2a to see whether > there's any reason this was left aside at that time. I am convinced > that it was just missed. I think this patch is good to be committed. Thanks for reviewing the patch and confirming! I've pushed the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
Optimize iteration over PGPROC for fast-path lock searches.
- e80171d57c25 18.0 landed
-
Increase the number of fast-path lock slots
- c4d5cb71d229 18.0 cited