Horton

Re: [Review] Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

View thread
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, cedric@2ndquadrant.com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Date: 2013-07-16T22:31:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 07/16/2013 03:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>>> Where are we with this patch?  Fabien, are you going to submit an
>>>> updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
>>>> Returned With Feedback?
> 
>>> There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed the objections with
>>> words, not code:-)
> 
>> So, Tom, Robert, Cedric: can we have a verdict?  Commit or no?
> 
> My vote is still no, because of (1) the keyword-creep issue, and
> (2) the fact that this is proposing to invent non-standard syntax
> for functionality that's in the SQL standard.

Ok, marking "Returned with Feedback".


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com