Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-03-11T16:40:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> The remote end has entirely misinterpreted the day vs month fields. > Now, to hit this you need to be using a datestyle which will print > in an ambiguous format, so the "ISO" and "Postgres" styles are > not vulnerable; but "German" and "SQL" are. Is the "timezone" GUC a problem, also, for this? Seems like that could be much worse ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix postgres_fdw's issues with inconsistent interpretation of data values.
- cc3f281ffb0a 9.3.0 cited