Re: WIP: store additional info in GIN index
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-03-03T14:53:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The GIN changes don't seem to have progressed in some time, and some of the most recent activity (http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/50BFF89A.7080908@fuzzy.cz) suggests unconvincing test results. Is this work considered to be a dead-end - a good idea that didn't work out in practice? Or do you think it still has merit and can be made useful and ready for inclusion? Given the activity level I would like to bounce this patch, either as "returned with feedback" if you want to take another go at it post-9.3, or as "rejected" if you think the idea won't go anywhere. Please let me know how you think it looks. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services