Re: Enabling Checksums
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-03T14:22:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/02/2013 12:48 AM, Daniel Farina wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Attached is some bit rot updates to the checksums patches. The replace-tli >> one still works fine.... > I rather badly want this feature, and if the open issues with the > patch has hit zero, I'm thinking about applying it, shipping it, and > turning it on. Given that the heap format has not changed, the main > affordence I may check for is if I can work in backwards compatibility > (while not maintaining the checksums, of course) in case of an > emergency. Did you get a chance to see whether you can run it in checksum-validation-and-update-off backward compatible mode? This seems like an important thing to have working (and tested for) in case of bugs, performance issues or other unforseen circumstances. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services