Horton

Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Zoltán Böszörményi <zb@cybertec.at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Hari Babu <haribabu.kommi@huawei.com>, 'Craig Ringer' <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs@cybertec.at>, 'Ants Aasma' <ants@cybertec.at>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers' <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 'Amit kapila' <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
Date: 2013-01-31T21:12:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
2013-01-31 19:38 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zolt=E1n_B=F6sz=F6rm=E9nyi?= <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
>> Thanks. A question though: how does "make check" or "make installcheck"
>> chooses between the *.out and its different *_N.out incarnations?
>> I couldn't find traces of prepared_xacts_1.out in any file saying "this
>> is the one to be used in this-and-this" configuration. Does the procedure
>> check against all versions and the least different one is reported?
> Exactly.  This is documented, see the "regression tests" chapter of the
> SGML manual.
>
> 			regards, tom lane

Thanks.

I tested my patch with installcheck and installcheck-parallel
using max_prepared_transactions=0 in the server and
it passed that way too.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
      http://www.postgresql.at/