Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC
james <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
From: james <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-27T23:51:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On the contrary, only a few months ago there was a far from groundless fear that Microsoft would do just that. Following considerable outcry they changed their mind. But this is definitely not just paranoia. As for w64 support, the mingw-64 project exists more or less explicitly to produce 64 bit compilers, including those hosted on mingw/msys. Huh. The only reason we have to use mingw64 or one of the assorted personal builds is because 'mingw support' doesn't deliver on its own, and last I looked there was a confusing variety of personal builds with various strengths and weaknesses. I managed to make some progress but we seem to be a ways off having a reference download (and ideally one with clang too I guess). I'd very much like there to be a good reference implementation, but the whole mingw/mingw64 thing is indicative of some problems, and reminds me of egcs. You have references to back up your statements, and demonstrate that it wasn't primarily FUD? FWIW I think the higher entry prices of pay-for VStudio almost guarantees continued availability of a free compiler, though it might end up slightly crippled, but I'm not a product planner for MS any more than you are.