Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-27T21:25:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/27/2013 02:48 PM, james wrote: >> Anyway, this is getting way off track. The point is that the MS SDKs and >> compilers are a bit of a mess and that MinGW support is useful because >> we can't rely on them continuing to offer free SDKs and compilers in >> future. > > Well, more compilers are always useful, but complaining that Microsoft > might withdraw their working compilers smacks of 'what if?' paranoia. > What if mingw support for Win64 was (sometimes/often/always/still) a > bit rubbish? Oh wait ... > On the contrary, only a few months ago there was a far from groundless fear that Microsoft would do just that. Following considerable outcry they changed their mind. But this is definitely not just paranoia. As for w64 support, the mingw-64 project exists more or less explicitly to produce 64 bit compilers, including those hosted on mingw/msys. cheers andrew