Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-27T21:25:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/27/2013 02:48 PM, james wrote:
>> Anyway, this is getting way off track. The point is that the MS SDKs and
>> compilers are a bit of a mess and that MinGW support is useful because
>> we can't rely on them continuing to offer free SDKs and compilers in 
>> future.
>
> Well, more compilers are always useful, but complaining that Microsoft 
> might withdraw their working compilers smacks of 'what if?' paranoia. 
> What if mingw support for Win64 was (sometimes/often/always/still) a 
> bit rubbish?  Oh wait ...
>

On the contrary, only a few months ago there was a far from groundless 
fear that Microsoft would do just that. Following considerable outcry 
they changed their mind. But this is definitely not just paranoia. As 
for w64 support, the mingw-64 project exists more or less explicitly to 
produce 64 bit compilers, including those hosted on mingw/msys.

cheers

andrew