Re: Virtual generated columns
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Expand virtual generated columns for ALTER COLUMN TYPE
- 5069fef1cfae 18.0 landed
-
Eliminate code duplication in replace_rte_variables callbacks
- 363a6e8c6fcf 18.0 landed
-
Expand virtual generated columns in the planner
- 1e4351af329f 18.0 landed
-
Virtual generated columns
- 83ea6c54025b 18.0 landed
-
Additional tests for stored generated columns
- 41084409f635 18.0 landed
-
Improve generated_stored test
- 44b61efb7928 18.0 landed
- 86749ea3b766 18.0 landed
-
Fix handling of CREATE DOMAIN with GENERATED constraint syntax
- 84a67725cd11 18.0 landed
-
Add pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints
- 14e87ffa5c54 18.0 cited
-
Put generated_stored test objects in a schema
- 894be11adfa6 18.0 landed
-
Rename regress test generated to generated_stored
- b9ed4969250d 18.0 landed
-
Small code simplification
- 7ff9afbbd1df 18.0 landed
-
Remove useless code
- e26d313bad92 18.0 landed
-
Remove useless initializations
- da2aeba8f533 18.0 landed
-
doc: Clarify that pg_attrdef also stores generation expressions
- da486d360103 18.0 landed
-
Clean out column-level pg_init_privs entries when dropping tables.
- 76618097a6c0 17.0 cited
-
Re-implement the ereport() macro using __VA_ARGS__.
- e3a87b4991cc 13.0 cited
Attachments
- v9-0001-Virtual-generated-columns.patch (text/plain) patch v9-0001
On 07.11.24 10:35, Dean Rasheed wrote: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 16:17, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> >> New patch version. > > What happened with the RLS support? It looks like you moved the code > to expand virtual generated columns back to the first loop in > fireRIRrules(), which doesn't work because RLS policies might contain > references to virtual generated columns. > > In the v7 patch, it was done in a separate loop, after the RLS policy > loop, which I thought was fine, except that I didn't like having a > whole new loop, opening and closing all the relations in the query. > Was there some other problem with that approach? I have no idea what happened there. I must have used the wrong patch version at some point. I have applied your patch to fix that back up. Also thanks for the RLS test cases.