Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-15T19:41:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> I'm not ignoring them; I just choose to work on other issues, since >>> there is no viable proposal for fixing them. I don't intend to put >>> my time into dead ends. >> So, that's a "show me a patch and we'll talk"? Understood, then. > Or even just a proposal. Well, he did have a proposal ... it just wasn't very credible. Moving the hint bits around is at best a zero-sum game; it seems likely to degrade cases we now handle well more than it improves cases we don't. I think what we need is a fundamentally new idea, and I've not seen one. regards, tom lane