Re: pg_dump/restore syntax checking bug?
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-23T13:57:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/22/2013 10:13 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> postgres@jd-laptop:~$ pg_restore -d test -P 'by(),hello()' foo.sqlc > > Note, the pg_restore doc makes no mention of trying to squeeze > multiple function prototypes in a single argument you've done here, or > of using multiple -P flags. > >> It appears we need better syntax checking. > > Can't really argue with this. But if you think these pg_restore > examples are bad, try this gem: > reindexdb --table='foo; ALTER ROLE limited WITH superuser' That is HORRIBLE! Looks like our base utilities need some attention. jD > > Josh > >