Re: Re: logical changeset generation v3 - comparison to Postgres-R change set format
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
From: Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-13T18:02:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/13/2013 12:30 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote: > On 01/13/2013 10:49 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> Does this hint that postgreSQL also needs an sameness operator >> ( "is" or "===" in same languages). > > How do people feel about adding a real sameness operator ? We'd need to define what "sameness" means. If this goes toward "exact match in binary representation", this gets a thumbs-up from me. As a first step in that direction, I'd see adjusting send() and recv() functions to use a portable binary format. A "sameness" operator could then be implemented by simply comparing two value's send() outputs. Regards Markus Wanner
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Rearrange storage of data in xl_running_xacts.
- 5c11725867ac 9.3.0 cited
-
Basic binary heap implementation.
- 7a2fe9bd0371 9.3.0 cited
-
Embedded list interface
- a66ee69add6e 9.3.0 cited
-
Refactor xlog.c to create src/backend/postmaster/startup.c
- 9aceb6ab3c20 9.2.0 cited