Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction

On 8.1.2013 22:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 8.1.2013 03:47, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> 
>>>>> * +1 for Alvaro's suggestion about avoiding palloc traffic by starting
>>>>> with 8 elements or so.
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>
>>> Not yet.  Initial size of srels array is still 1 element.
>>
>> I've checked the patch and I see there 'maxrels = 8' - or do you mean
>> something else?
> 
> Well, you need to ensure that the initial palloc is an array of that
> size.

Oh, right - I forgot to modify the palloc() call. Thanks for spotting
this. Attached is a patch with increased threshold and fixed palloc call.

Tomas