Thread
-
Minor fix in 'clean' action of 'src/backend/Makefile'
Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2013-01-02T16:05:17Z
Hi all, When we execute 'make clean' the file 'src/backend/replication/repl_gram.h' is not removed. The attached patch fix it. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
-
Re: Minor fix in 'clean' action of 'src/backend/Makefile'
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> — 2013-01-02T16:20:21Z
On 02.01.2013 18:05, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > Hi all, > > When we execute 'make clean' the file 'src/backend/replication/repl_gram.h' > is not removed. That's on purpose. repl_gram.h is generated by bison, along with repl_gram.c. Neither is removed by "make clean", because they're needed in a distribution tarball. "make maintainer-clean" does remove them. Hmm, looking closer though, repl_gram.h is not actually needed for anything, though. We could just remove the -d flag from the bison invocation and not build it to begin with. I'll go and do that.. - Heikki
-
Re: Minor fix in 'clean' action of 'src/backend/Makefile'
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> — 2013-01-02T16:23:08Z
On 02.01.2013 18:20, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Hmm, looking closer though, repl_gram.h is not actually needed for > anything, though. We could just remove the -d flag from the bison > invocation and not build it to begin with. I'll go and do that.. And looking even closer, we don't use the -d flag in git master anymore, so repl_gram.h is not being built, and there's nothing to do here. I suppose we could change back-branches to also not build it, but I don't think I'm going to bother. - Heikki
-
Re: Minor fix in 'clean' action of 'src/backend/Makefile'
Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> — 2013-01-02T17:26:42Z
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>wrote: > On 02.01.2013 18:20, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Hmm, looking closer though, repl_gram.h is not actually needed for >> anything, though. We could just remove the -d flag from the bison >> invocation and not build it to begin with. I'll go and do that.. >> > > And looking even closer, we don't use the -d flag in git master anymore, > so repl_gram.h is not being built, and there's nothing to do here. I > suppose we could change back-branches to also not build it, but I don't > think I'm going to bother. > > You all right... thanks.... -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello