Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover

On 02.10.2012 21:20, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Simon Riggs<simon@2ndquadrant.com>  wrote:
>> but its not high on my radar
>> right now unless you can explain why it should be higher.
>
> It may not be high, but I'm just worried that we are likely to forget to
> apply that change into HEAD if we postpone it furthermore.

Ping? I haven't been paying much attention to this, but please commit 
the 9.2 fix to HEAD. This just caused a small merge conflict when I 
tried to backport (or rather, forward-port) a patch. We do more changes 
to HEAD later.

- Heikki