Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to>
From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-21T16:32:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/21/12 5:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to> writes: >> Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after >> INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE. > > What about before it, ie > > STRICT UPDATE ... > > This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names, > and it seems to me to read more naturally too. Yeah, putting STRICT after the command wouldn't work for UPDATE. I like this one best so far, so I'm going with this syntax for the next version of the patch. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja