Horton

Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>

View thread
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-08T17:42:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix Windows implementation of PGSemaphoreLock.

2012-12-08 15:30 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
> On 2012-10-18 22:40:15 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> 2012-10-18 20:08 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>>> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
>>>>> this is the latest one, fixing a bug in the accounting
>>>>> of per-statement lock timeout handling and tweaking
>>>>> some comments.
>>>> Tom, are you able to give this patch some more time on this commitfest?
>>> I'm still hoping to get to it, but I've been spending a lot of time on
>>> bug fixing rather than patch review lately :-(.  If you're hoping to
>>> close out the current CF soon, maybe we should just slip it to the next
>>> one.
>> Fine by me. Thanks.
> According to this the current state of the patch should be "Ready for
> Committer" not "Needs Review" is that right? I changed the state for
> now...

Thanks. I just tried the patch on current GIT HEAD and
gives some offset warnings but no rejects. Also, it compiles
without warnings and still works as it should.
Should I post a new patch that applies cleanly?

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
      http://www.postgresql.at/