Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
From: Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-03T15:57:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/03/2012 04:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Is there anything to be gained *now* from merging those two concepts? >> I saw that as refactoring that can occur once we are happy it should >> take place, but isn't necessary. > > IMO it's a net loss in robustness of the autovac implementation. Agreed. That's only one aspect of it, though. From the other point of view, it would be a proof of stability for the bgworker implementation if autovacuum worked on top of it. Regards Markus Wanner