Re: WIP patch for hint bit i/o mitigation
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-21T21:30:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/16/12 9:03 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > Atri ran some quick n dirty tests to see if there > were any regressions. He benched a large scan followed by vacuum. So > far, results are inconclusive so better testing methodologies will > definitely be greatly appreciated. One of the challenges with working > in this part of the code is that it's quite difficult to make changes > without impacting at least some workloads. I'm adding something to pgbench-tools to test for some types of vacuum regressions that I've seen before. And the checksum benchmarking I've already signed up for overlaps with this one quite a bit. I'd suggest reviewers here focus on code quality, correctness, and targeted optimization testing. I'm working heavily on a larger benchmarking framework that both this and checksums will fit into right now. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com