Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Peter Geoghegan *EXTERN* <peter@2ndquadrant.com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-15T09:10:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/15/2012 04:56 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > > I would rather see this just turn into one of the things a more > general tuning tool knew how to do, executing against a fully setup > system. Having a useful implementation of commit_delay and useful docs > on it seems like enough of a jump forward for one release. Moving > fully into auto-tuning before getting more field feedback on how that > works out is pretty aggressive. > It'll also potentially make it harder to get reproducible results in benchmarking and testing across repeated runs, cause confusion when someone relocates a DB or changes hardware, and slow down initdb (and thus testing). I'd be all for making it part of a "test my hardware and tune my DB" tool, but not such a fan of doing it at initdb time. Making initdb less predictable and more complicated sounds like asking for trouble. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add microsecs/op display to pg_test_fsync utility
- 82e429794b34 9.3.0 cited