Re: WIP patch: add (PRE|POST)PROCESSOR options to COPY

On 11/14/2012 11:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I disagree with Simon's objection also, because neither reading from
> nor writing to an external program is likely to fit the model of
> reading/updating a table very well.  For instance, there's no good
> reason to suppose that reading twice will give the same results.  So
> force-fitting this usage into the FDW model is not going to work well.
>
> Nor do I really see the argument why a "pipe_fdw" module is cleaner
> than a "COPY TO/FROM pipe" feature.
>
> 			


Yeah, I agree, although the syntax looks a bit unclean.

Maybe something like

     COPY foo FROM wherever WITH (FILTER '/path/to/program')

might work better. You'd hook up the source to the filter as its stdin 
and read its stdout. Not sure what we'd do for \copy though.


cheers

andrew