Horton

Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>

View thread
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-14T18:34:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 26.06.2012 18:06, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>>>
>>>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>>>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>>>
>>> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
>>> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
>>> from there and committed into 9.2.
>>
>> Yep! I've added it to next CF.
>
> Attached is the revised version of the patch.

Looks good to me, committed.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com