Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>

From: "Thomas Swan" <tswan@idigx.com>
To: "Dustin Sallings" <dustin@spy.net>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>, "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>, "Tom Lane " <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "David Garamond " <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-25T21:01:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
<quote who="Dustin Sallings">
>
> On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote:
>
>> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the
>> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone
>> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it.
>
> 	I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well
> supported on Windows as postgres is.
>

It that like the best beach volleball player in Antarctica?  The Windows
port of Postgresql is still in its infancy.  It's coming along, but its
not a finished product.


> 	The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares
> could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys
> are interested in making.  I've seen such discussions on the list.
>
> --
> Dustin Sallings
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>