Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2002-01-23T19:57:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes: > One of the things schemas have to support is essentially a PATH specifier. Yes, but... > So all we need to do is have all of the schemas created in a new DB have > path specifiers pulling in all of the other schemas. Thus we can make a > schema-savy system act as if it has only one namespace. When you create a new user, do all those path specifiers for the existing users magically update themselves? Seems like maintenance would be a pain. Fernando's "any" idea is probably a cleaner way to handle it if we wanted to do things like that. But I still think it'll be safer and more controllable if we provide a "public" namespace instead; see followup discussions. regards, tom lane