Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-09-08T16:26:52Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I'm not really happy with the naming, comments, or some of the code
> flow, but I think the concept looks reasonable.

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary palloc/pfree traffic in this
implementation.  Getting rid of that might help the speed.

			regards, tom lane