Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination
- 717d0e8dd945 18.0 landed
-
Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample
- c2d329260cd8 18.0 landed
-
Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()
- e167191dc146 18.0 landed
-
Implement Self-Join Elimination
- fc069a3a6319 18.0 cited
-
Revert: Remove useless self-joins
- d1d286d83c0e 17.0 landed
-
Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries
- 466979ef031a 17.0 landed
-
Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE
- 489072ab7a9e 17.0 landed
-
Forbid SJE with result relation
- 8c441c082797 17.0 landed
-
Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE
- 30b4955a4668 17.0 landed
-
Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE
- a7928a57b9f0 17.0 landed
-
Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.
- a448e49bcbe4 16.0 cited
-
Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.
- 4a071afbd056 14.0 cited
-
Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels
- 3373c7155350 13.0 cited
-
Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.
- 24d08f3c0a1f 12.0 landed
Attachments
- 0001-Replace-relids-in-lateral-subquery-target-list-du-v2.patch (text/plain) patch v2-0001
On 18/2/2024 23:18, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:04 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 09.01.2024 01:09, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>> >>> Fixed in 30b4955a46. >>> >>> >>> Please look at the following query which fails with an error since >>> d3d55ce57: >>> >>> create table t (i int primary key); >>> >>> select t3.i from t t1 >>> join t t2 on t1.i = t2.i, >>> lateral (select t1.i limit 1) t3; >>> >>> ERROR: non-LATERAL parameter required by subquery >> >> Thank you for spotting. I'm looking at this. > > Attached is a draft patch fixing this query. Could you, please, recheck? I reviewed this patch. Why do you check only the target list? I guess these links can be everywhere. See the patch in the attachment with the elaborated test and slightly changed code. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov Postgres Professional