Thread

  1. Re: BUG #19335: the function encrypt does not work correct - ERROR: encrypt error: Key was too big

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-11-28T18:29:21Z

    Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
    > On 28 Nov 2025, at 11:38, <Marco.Lebahn@kfw.de> <Marco.Lebahn@kfw.de> wrote:
    >> It seems that < 16.11 does and not check if I use "bf" from legacy provider
    
    > OpenSSL doesn't support blowfish without the legacy provider loaded.  Your
    > 16.10 is most likely linked against another version of OpenSSL, or at least
    > using another OpenSSL configuration/openssldir.
    
    It seems quite odd that this changed at a minor PG version update.
    I wonder if there was an upgrade of the underlying platform at the
    same time, or if the new version was built by a different packager.
    
    I confirmed on a fresh Fedora installation (with OpenSSL 3.2.6)
    that it works as Daniel described.  Blowfish and other old ciphers
    don't work with the out-of-the-box OpenSSL configuration, but if
    you edit `openssl info -configdir`/openssl.cnf and uncomment the
    lines that enable the legacy provider, it will work.  (I found
    I had to restart the PG server, too --- apparently we only absorb
    that configuration at postmaster start.  Didn't think to try
    "pg_ctl reload"; perhaps that would have been enough.)
    
    Of course the real bottom line here is you should be migrating
    away from use of these ciphers.  There's a reason they are
    deprecated and intentionally made hard-to-reach.
    
    			regards, tom lane