Horton

Re: Shouldn't psql -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP?

Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-25T17:12:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Am 25.07.2009 um 15:00 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:

> When you run a file with psql -1/--single-transaction, and a command  
> fails,
> you get bombarded with
>
> ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of
> transaction block
>
> for the rest of the file.
>
> Shouldn't -1 imply ON_ERROR_STOP or some variant by default?

Sounds reasonable, +1 from me.

Regards
Michael Paesold