Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest'
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-05T17:08:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05.09.2012 07:55, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >> I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see >> last paragraph at >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php. > > Mmm, ok. > > I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master > disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from > the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this > case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps? The second standby will have to reconnect, but it will happen automatically. - Heikki