Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-03T17:47:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to >> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system. >> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of >> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant blocker, so >> I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all together. > My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the > unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD > (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr > changes). Will that cause any problems for what you're doing? > > No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2? cheers andrew