Re: converting Oracle to postgres
Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>
From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, will trillich <will@serensoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-07T15:27:29Z
Lists: pgsql-general
At 09:58 AM 2/7/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >will trillich <will@serensoft.com> writes: > > i think plpgsql is standard these days, so you should be able to > > create procedures without having to "install" or "activate" it. > >No, you still do need to do 'createlang' to set it up. There's been >debate about whether to make it standard. A paranoid DBA might not >*want* PLs available. Yes. Don't want a repeat of MS SQL Server. I'm sure there are people who need to format c:\, dir, etc using MS SQL. But most people don't need this stuff installed by default. It might not be so bad at the start if you install a language by default. But if the language/features get extended you could end up with a lose-lose situation. Regards, Link.