Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

At 11:50 25/04/02 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Just curious here, but has anyone taken the time to see how others are
> > doing this?  For instance, if we go with 1, are going against how everyone
> > else handles it?  IMHO, its not a popularity contest ...

Dec/RDB (and I think Oracle as well) ignores transactions. Even 
configuration commands (eg. setting date formats etc) ignore transactions.

I think the key thing here is that they view variables as part of a 
programming language built on top of the database backend (like plpgsql). 
As a result they separate variable management from database management.

FWIW, I would be in the '?' camp - assuming that means some kind of 
session-specific setting...failing that, I'd probably start looking for an 
interactive form of plpgsql, so I could get persistant variables.