Re: Add a write_to_file member to PgStat_KindInfo
Yogesh Sharma <yogesh.sharma@catprosystems.com>
From: Yogesh Sharma <yogesh.sharma@catprosystems.com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-21T17:57:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Thanks for patch. I have tested both patches and they work as per design. My +1 for v1, it is much cleaner approach and has properly named functions whereas in v2 it is not. Injection points is documented, if so, doc patch is missing. Regards, Yogesh On 11/20/24 12:13, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:45:55PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: >> I think this is a good idea. +1 for the $SUBJECT. > Thanks for looking at it! > >> There are duplicated codes in the injection_stats_fixed.c file. Do you >> think that 'modifying existing functions to take an argument to >> differentiate whether the kind is default or no-write' would be >> better? > Some of the new functions are callbacks so we don't have the control on the > parameters list that the core is expecting. > > It remains: > > pgstat_register_inj_fixed_no_write() > pgstat_report_inj_fixed_no_write() > injection_points_stats_fixed_no_write() > > for which I think we could add an extra "write_to_file" argument on their original > counterparts. > > Not sure how many code reduction we would get, so out of curiosity I did the > exercice in v2 attached and that gives us: > > v1: > 8 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > v2: > 8 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > I don't have a strong opinion for this particular case here (I think the code > is harder to read but yeah there is some code reduction): so I'm fine with > v2 too. > > Regards, >
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add write_to_file to PgStat_KindInfo for pgstats kinds
- c06e71d1acaf 18.0 landed