Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>,
Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>,
Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>,
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com.br>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Date: 2018-12-15T15:21:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 14/12/2018 19:44, Robert Haas wrote: > I'm showing up very late to the party here, but I like option 1 best. > I feel like the SQL standard has a pretty clear idea that NULL is how > you represent a value is unknown, which shows up in a lot of places. > Deciding that we're going to use a different sentinel value in this > one case because NULL is a confusing concept in general seems pretty > strange to me. [The difference between #1 and #4 is whether "any" is represented as NULL or 0.] An example: select pg_stat_statements_reset( 10, (select min(oid) from pg_database where datname like 'test%'), 1234); (This is obviously a weird example, but it illustrates the language-theoretic point.) If you have no matching databases, under #1 this would then apply to all databases. Under #4 it would not. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Extend pg_stat_statements_reset to reset statistics specific to a
- 43cbedab8ff1 12.0 landed
-
Default monitoring roles
- 25fff40798fc 10.0 cited