Re: SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>
To: "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>,
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>,
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@postgrespro.ru>,
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2017-03-10T19:28:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 03/09/2017 10:12 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > On 08.03.2017 20:52, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca >> <mailto:pvh@pvh.ca>> wrote: >> >> Small point of order: YAML is not strictly a super-set of JSON. >> >> Editorializing slightly, I have not seen much interest in the >> world for YAML support though I'd be interested in evidence to the >> contrary. >> >> >> The world of configuration management seems to for some reason run off >> YAML, but that's the only places I've seen it recently (ansible, >> puppet etc). > > SaltStack uses YAML for their tools, too. I personally can empathize > with them (as a user of configuration management) about this as writing > JSON would be nightmare with all the quoting, commas, curly braces etc. > But that's my own preference maybe. > > (Btw. does "run off" mean like or avoid? At least my dictionaries tend > to the latter.) Yes, but automated tools can easily convert between JSON and newline-delimited YAML and back. -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My!
Commits
-
SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicate
- 6ee30209a6f1 16.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functions
- 7081ac46ace8 16.0 landed