Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@enterprisedb.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-11T12:53:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/11/22 12:34, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:59 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/7/22 22:25, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Interesting. I can think of one reason that might cause this - we log
>>>> the first sequence increment after a checkpoint. So if a checkpoint
>>>> happens in an unfortunate place, there'll be an extra WAL record. On
>>>> slow / busy machines that's quite possible, I guess.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've tweaked the checkpoint_interval to make checkpoints more aggressive
>>> (set it to 1s), and it seems my hunch was correct - it produces failures
>>> exactly like this one. The best fix probably is to just disable decoding
>>> of sequences in those tests that are not aimed at testing sequence decoding.
>>>
>>
>> I've pushed a fix for this, adding "include-sequences=0" to a couple
>> test_decoding tests, which were failing with concurrent checkpoints.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I realized we have a similar issue in the "sequences"
>> tests too :-( Imagine you do a series of sequence increments, e.g.
>>
>> SELECT nextval('s') FROM generate_sequences(1,100);
>>
>> If there's a concurrent checkpoint, this may add an extra WAL record,
>> affecting the decoded output (and also the data stored in the sequence
>> relation itself). Not sure what to do about this ...
>>
>
> I am also not sure what to do for it but maybe if in some way we can
> increase checkpoint timeout or other parameters for these tests then
> it would reduce the chances of such failures. The other idea could be
> to perform checkpoint before the start of tests to reduce the
> possibility of another checkpoint.
>
Yeah, I had the same ideas, but I'm not sure I like any of them. I doubt
we want to make checkpoints extremely rare, and even if we do that it'll
still fail on slow machines (e.g. with valgrind, clobber cache etc.).
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Fix cache invalidation bug in recovery_prefetch.
- d0d934490020 15.0 landed
- 932b01630095 16.0 landed
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 landed
-
Minor improvements in sequence decoding code and docs
- 05843b1aa49d 15.0 landed
-
Handle sequences in preprocess_pubobj_list
- 002c9dd97a0c 15.0 landed
-
Update tab-completion for CREATE PUBLICATION with sequences
- 2d2232933b02 15.0 landed
-
Add decoding of sequences to built-in replication
- 75b1521dae1f 15.0 landed
-
Stabilize test_decoding touching with sequences
- a180c2b34de0 15.0 landed
-
Call ReorderBufferProcessXid from sequence_decode
- d5ed9da41d96 15.0 landed
-
Add decoding of sequences to test_decoding
- 80901b32913f 15.0 landed
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Logical decoding of sequences
- 0da92dc530c9 15.0 landed
-
Respect permissions within logical replication.
- a2ab9c06ea15 15.0 cited