Horton

Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby

Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Date: 2026-03-04T09:00:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
04.03.2026 10:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Did you find any buildfarm failures involving 028?  I cannot get
> excited in changing tests where nothing has happened, and this test
> looks OK as we don't do a switchover.  For 004, we have at least one
> failure recorded based on what you said.  That's a fact sufficient for
> me to fix things, for 004.

No, I didn't. I agree that eliminating already known failures makes more
sense. Anyway, we'll have the thread which explain why such failures can
happen.

Best regards,
Alexander

Commits

  1. Fix rare instability in recovery TAP test 004_timeline_switch

  2. Fix rare instability in recovery TAP test 009_twophase