Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>

From: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-05T14:02:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On 2018-04-05 00:09, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Thank you for review!  Revised patchset is attached.
> [0001-Covering-core-v12.patch]
> [0002-Covering-btree-v12.patch]
> [0003-Covering-amcheck-v12.patch]
> [0004-Covering-natts-v12.patch]

Really nice performance gains.

I read through the docs and made some changes.  I hope it can count as 
improvement.

It would probably also be a good idea to add the term "covering index" 
somewhere, at least in the documentation's index; the term does now not 
occur anywhere.  (This doc-patch does not add it)

thanks,

Erik Rijkers

Commits

  1. Adjust INCLUDE index truncation comments and code.

  2. Add commentary explaining why MaxIndexTuplesPerPage calculation is safe.

  3. Indexes with INCLUDE columns and their support in B-tree

  4. Add amcheck verification of heap relations belonging to btree indexes.

  5. Doc: move info for btree opclass implementors into main documentation.

  6. Doc: mention that you can't PREPARE TRANSACTION after NOTIFY.

  7. Remove dedicated B-tree root-split record types.

  8. Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.

  9. Split _bt_insertonpg to two functions.

  10. Major overhaul of btree index code. Eliminate special BTP_CHAIN logic for