Re: Add --check option to pgindent
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>,
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-13T20:46:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-12-12 Tu 10:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2023-Dec-12, Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> writes: >>> When you add exceptions, it starts to complicate the UI. >> Indeed. It seems like --silent-diff was poorly defined and poorly >> named, and we need to rethink that option along the way to adding >> this behavior. The idea that --show-diff and --silent-diff can >> be used together is just inherently confusing, because they sound >> like opposites > Maybe it's enough to rename --silent-diff to --check. You can do > "--show-diff --check" and get both the error and the diff printed; or > just "--check" and it'll throw an error without further ado; or > "--show-diff" and it will both apply the diff and print it. > That seems reasonable. These features were fairly substantially debated when we put them in, but I'm fine with some tweaking. But note: --show-diff doesn't apply the diff, it's intentionally non-destructive. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Rename pgindent options
- 387aecc948ed 17.0 landed