Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: path toward faster partition pruning
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Hi David.
Thanks for the review.
(..also looking at the comments you sent earlier today.)
On 2017/11/07 11:14, David Rowley wrote:
> On 7 November 2017 at 01:52, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Thanks. I'll look over it all again starting my Tuesday morning. (UTC+13)
>
> I have a little more review to share:
>
> 1. Missing "in" in comment. Should be "mentioned in"
>
> * get_append_rel_partitions
> * Return the list of partitions of rel that pass the clauses mentioned
> * rel->baserestrictinfo
>
> 2. Variable should be declared in inner scope with the following fragment:
>
> void
> set_basic_child_rel_properties(PlannerInfo *root,
> RelOptInfo *rel,
> RelOptInfo *childrel,
> AppendRelInfo *appinfo)
> {
> AttrNumber attno;
>
> if (rel->part_scheme)
> {
>
> which makes the code the same as where you moved it from.
It seems like you included the above changes in your attached C file,
which I will incorporate into my repository.
> 3. Normally lfirst() is assigned to a variable at the start of a
> foreach() loop. You have code which does not follow this.
>
> foreach(lc, clauses)
> {
> Expr *clause;
> int i;
>
> if (IsA(lfirst(lc), RestrictInfo))
> {
> RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst(lc);
>
> You could assign this to a Node * since the type is unknown to you at
> the start of the loop.
Will make the suggested changes to match_clauses_to_partkey().
> 4.
> /*
> * Useless if what we're thinking of as a constant is actually
> * a Var coming from this relation.
> */
> if (bms_is_member(rel->relid, constrelids))
> continue;
>
> should this be moved to just above the op_strict() test? This one seems cheaper.
Agreed, will do. Also makes sense to move the PartCollMatchesExprColl()
test together.
> 5. Typo "paritions": /* No clauses to prune paritions, so scan all
> partitions. */
>
> But thinking about it more the comment should something more along the
> lines of /* No useful clauses for partition pruning. Scan all
> partitions. */
You fixed it. :)
> The key difference is that there might be clauses, just without Consts.
>
> Actually, the more I look at get_append_rel_partitions() I think it
> would be better if you re-shaped that if/else if test so that it only
> performs the loop over the partindexes if it's been set.
>
> I ended up with the attached version of the function after moving
> things around a little bit.
Thanks a lot for that. Looks much better now.
> I'm still reviewing but thought I'd share this part so far.
As mentioned at the top, I'm looking at your latest comments and they all
seem to be good points to me, so will address those in the next version.
Thanks,
Amit
Commits
-
Fix assorted partition pruning bugs
- d758d9702e2f 11.0 landed
-
Make gen_partprune_steps static
- d1e2cac5ff7e 11.0 landed
-
Remove useless 'default' clause
- c775fb9e18ac 11.0 landed
-
Reorganize partitioning code
- da6f3e45ddb6 11.0 landed
-
Use custom hash opclass for hash partition pruning
- fafec4cce814 11.0 landed
-
Blindly attempt to fix sepgsql tests broken due to 9fdb675fc5.
- 4f813c7203e0 11.0 landed
-
Attempt to fix endianess issues in new hash partition test.
- 40e42e1024c5 11.0 landed
-
Faster partition pruning
- 9fdb675fc5d2 11.0 landed
-
For partitionwise join, match on partcollation, not parttypcoll.
- 2af28e603319 11.0 landed
-
Revise API for partition bound search functions.
- f724022d0ae0 11.0 landed
-
Revise API for partition_rbound_cmp/partition_rbound_datum_cmp.
- b0229235564f 11.0 landed
-
Fix possible crash in partition-wise join.
- f069c91a5793 11.0 cited
-
Refactor code for partition bound searching
- 9aef173163ae 11.0 landed
-
New C function: bms_add_range
- 84940644de93 11.0 landed
-
Add extensive tests for partition pruning.
- 8d4e70a63bf8 11.0 landed
-
Add null test to partition constraint for default range partitions.
- 7b88d63a9122 11.0 cited
-
Remove BufFile's isTemp flag.
- 11e264517dff 11.0 cited
-
Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent
- bf54c0f05c0a 11.0 cited
-
Fix index matching for operators with mixed collatable/noncollatable inputs.
- cb37c291060d 9.2.0 cited