Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.
Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
From: Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, Asif Naeem <asif.naeem@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2012-07-06T21:12:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 06/07/12 22:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2012-07-06 at 18:53 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> What shall we do about those? Ignore them? Document that if you're sing >>> one of these encodings then PL/Python with Python 2 will be crippled and >>> with Python 3 just won't work? >> >> We could convert to UTF-8, and use the PostgreSQL functions to convert >> from UTF-8 to the server encoding. Double conversion might be slow, but >> I think it would be better than failing. > > Actually, we already do the other direction that way > (PLyUnicode_FromStringAndSize) , so maybe it would be more consistent to > always use this. > > I would hesitate to use this as a kind of fallback, because then we > would sometimes be using PostgreSQL's recoding tables and sometimes > Python's recoding tables, which could became confusing. So you're in favour of doing unicode -> bytes by encoding with UTF-8 and then using the server's encoding functions?
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.
- b66de4c6d720 9.3.0 cited