Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Date: 2012-06-29T17:44:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom, > If we could do that on *all* platforms, I might be for it, but we only > know how to get that number on some platforms. I don't see what's wrong with using it where we can get it, and not using it where we can't. > There's also the issue > of whether we really want to assume that the machine is dedicated to > Postgres, which IMO is an implicit assumption of any default that scales > itself to physical RAM. 10% isn't assuming dedicated. Assuming dedicated would be 20% or 25%. I was thinking "10%, with a ceiling of 512MB". > For the moment I think we should just allow initdb to scale up a little > bit more than where it is now, perhaps 128MB instead of 32. I wouldn't be opposed to that. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com