Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets
Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
From: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Date: 2012-06-06T15:21:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 06/06/2012 04:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 04:38:42 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Florian Pflug<fgp@phlo.org> writes: > >>> If we're going to have this at all, we should go all the way and >>> support an arbitrary number of sockets. >> >> Well, that's what I wanted to discuss before Honza starts coding. >> It's not obvious that there are any use-cases for more than two. >> It's also not clear whether there is any value in supporting run-time >> rather than build-time configuration of the socket locations. The >> Fedora use-case has no need of that, but if people can point to other >> cases where it would be sensible, we can write the patch that way. > I had the need to make pg available from multiple chroots via unix sockets. > The same might come up more frequently with the availability of filesystem > namespaces... It seems you were not alone with such need: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2006-09/msg00172.php Honza