Re: Draft release notes complete
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-05-21T18:10:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.
- 5b4f34661143 9.2.0 cited
-
Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.
- 80da9e68fdd7 9.2.0 cited
-
Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.
- d50e1251946a 9.2.0 cited
-
Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a
- 7f3bd86843e5 9.2.0 cited
> For these reasons, it may be timely and appropriate, from a purely > advocacy point-of-view, to call our new group commit "group commit" in > release notes and documentation, and announce it as a new feature. First, shouldn't we be having this discussion on -advocacy? To date, I've been calling it "better group commit". -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com