Horton

Re: Draft release notes complete

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

View thread
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-05-10T18:15:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.

  2. Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.

  3. Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.

  4. Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a

>>> Then reviewers should be removed.
>>
>> I disagree.  We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
>> do more reviewing.  Giving credit is a big part of that.
> 
> Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion?

Hah, good point.  I'm disagreeing with the conclusion that reviewers
should be removed, unless we're going to remove everyone *and* give them
credit elsewhere.  Which I would also be in favor of, I'm just not able
to do the work right now.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com