Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2012-05-10T00:06:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 9.1-memory-leak-regression.sql (text/x-sql)
On 05/09/2012 03:36 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > Good call -- of course that just means my contrived example fails to > duplicate the real issue :-( > In the real example, even with work_mem = 1 MB I see the same behavior > on 9.1. OK, new script. This more faithfully represents the real life scenario, and reproduces the issue on HEAD with out-of-the-box config settings, versus 8.1 which completes the query having never exceeded a very modest memory usage: --------------- On pg 8.1 with out of the box config: VIRT RES SHR 199m 11m 3032 --------------- On pg head with out of the box config: VIRT RES SHR 1671m 1.5g 16m --------------- I have not tried your ulimit suggestion yet but will do that next. Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support