Horton

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>

View thread
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-02-13T11:50:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

(2012/02/10 20:39), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> (2012/02/08 20:51), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
>> Attached revised patches.  Changes from last version are below.
> <snip>
> 
> I've found and fixed a bug which generates wrong remote query when any
> column of a foreign table has been dropped.  Also regression test for
> this case is added.
> 
> I attached only pgsql_fdw_v8.patch, because pgsql_fdw_pushdown_v3.patch
> in last post still can be applied onto v8 patch.
> 
> Regards,

The patches have been applied, but role-related regression tests failed
in my environment.  I fixed it in a similar fashion of
/src/test/regress/sql/foreign_data.sql.  Please find attached a updated
patch for the regression tests.

BTW, What do you think about this?

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-01/msg00229.php

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita